MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078899561 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.120803

HLA-B*5801 Should Be Used to Screen for Risk of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in Family Members of Han Chinese Patients Commencing Allopurinol Therapy

2013· letter· en· W2078899561 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.H. Lee, Sophie L. Stocker, Kenneth M. Williams, Richard O. Day

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of New South Wales
KeywordsAllopurinolMedicineHyperuricemiaToxic epidermal necrolysisGoutRashDermatologyInternal medicineExfoliative dermatitisUric acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Allopurinol is the major drug used in the treatment of gout and hyperuricemia. Generally, the drug is well tolerated, although a minority of people, about 2%, develop a hypersensitivity reaction with rash or, less frequently, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)1. A multinational study reported that allopurinol is the most common drug associated with SJS and toxic epidermal necrolysis2. Genomic studies have shown that the HLA-B*5801 allele is a strong risk factor (OR 34–348) for developing allopurinol-induced SJS3,4,5,6,7,8. However, the clinical utility of HLA-B*5801 is unclear. We conducted an observational study in the immediate family members of a male patient who experienced allopurinol-induced SJS in 1997 (index case). The patient, now 72 years old, was diagnosed with SJS by a dermatologist when he developed a generalized blistering rash, fever, and internal organ failure … Address correspondence to Dr. R.O. Day, Clinical Pharmacology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia. E-mail: R.Day{at}unsw.edu.au

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207