MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078930259 · doi:10.2322/jjsass.58.171

Investigation of an Evaluation Method on the Improvement of Thrust and Specific Impulse by Nozzle Heating

2010· article· en· W2078930259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tetsushi NAGANUMA, Yuuki IWAKI, Shunya Sato, Tsuyoshi TOTANI, Masashi WAKITA, Harunori Nagata

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropellantNozzleSpecific impulseThrustMaterials scienceMechanicsPrandtl numberHeat transferThermodynamicsInletImpulse (physics)Energy transformationAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical analysis program is created to research effect of heat transfer for propellant flow in Laval nozzle and estimate improvements of thrust and specific impulse. Several types of gases are assumed as propellant. The energy ratio is defined as ratio of energy supplied to propellant by convective heat transfer to enthalpy of propellant at the inlet of nozzle. The energy ratio increases with elongating length of divergent nozzle, and finally becomes maximum value that depends on Prandtl number, propellant temperature and wall temperature at the inlet of nozzle. The conversion efficiency is defined as ratio of energy conversion to kinetic energy with nozzle to energy supplied to propellant. The conversion efficiency increases with elongating of divergent nozzle, and depends on profile of supplied heat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCESSame topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207