MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2078955928 · doi:10.1021/cm050253x

Synthesis and Electropolymerization Behavior of Bis (Oligothienyl) Sulfides. Generation of Heteroaromatic Poly(<i>p</i>-phenylene sulfide) Analogs

2005· article· en· W2078955928 on OpenAlexaff
M’hamed Chahma, Daniel J. T. Myles, Robin G. Hicks

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThiopheneElectrochemistryMonomerSulfidePhenyleneConductive polymerPolymerSolubilityMoleculePolymer chemistryChemistryRedoxMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis and electrochemical properties of a series of bis(thiophene) sulfides is presented. The molecules were synthesized via either thiophenethiol substitution reactions with thienyl bromides or treatment of lithiated thiophenes with bis(phenylsulfonyl) sulfide. Bis(oligothienyl) sulfides based on thiophene, 3-hexylthiophene, and 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene were similarly prepared. Investigation of the electrochemical properties reveal that, despite the presence of α,ω-CH positions on the two thiophene termini, not all derivatives formed polymers upon electro-oxidation. In some cases the inherent stability of the radical cation precluded coupling reactions; in others, radical cation solubility prevented electrodeposition of the putative polymer. Five of the monomers could be electropolymerized to afford poly(oligothienyl sulfides) which were characterized by electronic spectroscopy and electrochemical studies. Good correlations were found between the polymer redox properties and corresponding bis(arylthio) oligothiophene molecules previously reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207