MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Retiming the Failing Right Ventricle

2005· article· en· W2079061987 on OpenAlexaff
Peter J. Cowburn, John D. Parker, Douglas Cameron, Louise Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiac resynchronization therapyCardiologyInternal medicineVentricleHeart failureGreat arteriesEjection fractionTransposition (logic)Population

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms, reduces hospitalization, and may decrease mortality in patients with moderate/severe heart failure and left bundle branch block. Whether CRT may have a role in the management of patients with adult congenital heart disease and a failing right (systemic) ventricle is unknown. We report the case of an adult patient with transposition of the great arteries and previous Mustard's repair, who successfully underwent CRT using a hybrid transvenous/epicardial approach. Exercise tolerance improved, right ventricular (systemic) ejection fraction improved, diuretic requirements reduced, and renal function improved. CRT may offer a new therapeutic option for this patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207