Regulation of Caspase 3 and Fas in Pressure Overload-Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The presence of apoptotic cell death in cardiac myocytes is now well established and the contribution of apoptosis for the development of heart failure has been suggested. However, the mechanism responsible for the induction of apoptosis remains unclear. The present study was designed to investigate the involvement of Fas and caspase 3 in the transition from pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) to left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). METHODS: Pressure overload induced LVH (10 days) and LVD (30 days) were induced by thoracic aortic banding. Changes in apoptosis-related genes were studied in rats with thoracic aortic banding. After 10 and 30 days, cardiac Fas mRNA expression was measured by RT-PCR. The mRNA expression of caspase 3 was detected by RNase protection assay. The activity of caspase 3 was measured by fluorometric assay. Protein levels of caspase 3 were measured by Western blot. RESULTS: Rats with aortic banding had increased heart/body weight ratios after 10 and 30 days, compared to controls. Central venous pressure and lung weights were increased, left ventricular contractility was significantly impaired only in rats after 30 days of aortic banding, indicating LVD. Caspase 3 mRNA expression (7.1+/-0.1 vs. 2.8+/-0.4, P<0.05), caspase 3 activity (1418+/-181 vs. 849+/-154 AU, P<0.05) as well as caspase 3 protein levels were increased in rats with LVD but not with LVH. Similarly, Fas mRNA was increased in rats with LVD. CONCLUSIONS: The activation of Fas and caspase 3 only after 30 days of aortic banding suggests that induction of these pathways may be involved in pressure overload-induced LVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".