Interharmonics in internal gravity waves generated by tide-topography interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamics and spectrum of internal gravity waves generated in a linearly stratified fluid by tidal flow over a flat-topped ridge are investigated at five different latitudes using an inviscid two-dimensional numerical model. The resulting wave field includes progressive freely propagating waves which satisfy the dispersion relation, and forced waves which are trapped non-propagating oscillations with frequencies outside the internal wave band. The flow is largely stable with respect to shear instabilities, and, throughout the runs, there is a negligibly small amount of overturning which is confined to the highly nonlinear regions along the sloping topography and where tidal beams reflect from the boundaries. The wave spectrum exhibits a self-similar structure with prominent peaks at tidal harmonics and interharmonics, whose magnitudes decay exponentially with frequency. Two strong subharmonics are generated by an instability of tidal beams which is particularly strong for near-critical latitudes where the Coriolis frequency is half the tidal frequency. When both subharmonics are within the free internal wave range (as in cases 0°–20° N), they form a resonant triad with the tidal harmonic. When at least one of the two subharmonics is outside of the range (as in cases 30°–40° N) the observed instability is no longer a resonant triad interaction. We argue that the two subharmonics are generated by parametric subharmonic instability that can produce both progressive and forced waves. Other interharmonics are produced through wave–wave interactions and are not an artefact of Doppler shifting as assumed by previous authors. As the two subharmonics are, in general, not proper fractions of the tidal frequency, the wave–wave interactions are capable of transferring energy to a continuum of frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".