A report of women's birth experiences in Baku, Azerbaijan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The findings from a survey exploring women's perceptions of their care during pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period in Baku, Azerbaijan, initiated by the Ministry of Health and UNICEF, are reported here. In the former Soviet Union, on which the perinatal health care systems of Azerbaijan are based, care for women during the perinatal period was based on using available technology and on a physician-centred model of care. Women's perceptions of their care were infrequently if ever sought or heeded. As healthcare systems are being strengthened in these countries, there is an increasing interest in providing a woman-centered or family-centered approach to care as well as offering appropriate medical care birthing procedures. This study explores the progress made in Azerbaijan in implementing such changes since the introduction of a perinatal reform process a few years ago. Findings indicate some significant deviations from traditional maternity care practices in Baku since the breakdown of the Soviet Union. A more humanistic and evidence-based approach to care is being introduced. It is evident that maternity houses in Baku are also providing better support for infant feeding than many of their former Soviet Union counterparts indicating the effective implementation of the principles of breastfeeding encouraged through the WHO/UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative program in that country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".