Biodegradation of Polyfluoroalkyl Phosphates as a Source of Perfluorinated Acids to the Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as a major source of perfluorocarboxylates (PFCAs) to aqueous environments. The observed increase in PFCA mass flows from WWTP influent to effluent suggests the biodegradation of commercial fluorinated materials within the WWTP. Commercial fluorinated surfactants are used as greaseproofing agents in food-contact paper products as well as leveling and wetting agents. As WWTPs are likely the major fate of these surfactants, their biodegradation may be a source of PFCA production. One class of commercial surfactants, the polyfluoroalkyl phosphates (PAPs), have been observed in WWTP sludge. While PAPs have been shown to degrade into PFCAs in a rat model, the present study investigates their microbial fate to determine whether the biodegradation of PAPs within a WWTP-simulated system will contribute to the load of PFCAs released. PAPs are applied commercially in mixed formulations of different chain lengths and substitution at the phosphate center. The effect of chain length and phosphate substitution on the biodegradation of PAPs was investigated by incubating mixtures of 4:2, 6:2, 8:2, and 10:2 monosubstituted PAPs (monoPAPs) in an aerobic microbial system and by separately incubating the 6:2 monoPAP and 6:2 disubstituted PAP (diPAP) for 92 days. Headspace sampling revealed production of the fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) from the hydrolysis of the PAP phosphate ester linkages. Analysis of the aqueous phase revealed microbial transformation of the PAPs to the final PFCA products was possible. The majority of the oxidation products observed were consistent with previous investigations that have suggested fluorotelomer precursor compounds degrade predominantly via a beta-oxidation-like mechanism. However, in this study, the detection of odd-chain PFCAs suggests that other pathways may be important. The present study demonstrated microbially mediated biodegradation of PAPs to PFCAs. This observation, together with the diPAP concentrations observed in WWTP sludge, suggest PAPs-containing commercial products may be a significant contributor to the increased PFCA mass flows observed in WWTP effluents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".