MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079152333 · doi:10.7202/1024924ar

Croyances épistémologiques de futurs enseignants du secondaire

2014· article· fr· W2079152333 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Geneviève Therriault, Léon Harvey, Philippe Jonnaert

Bibliographic record

VenueMesure et évaluation en éducation · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational Strategies and Epistemologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deux hypothèses selon lesquelles les croyances épistémologiques des enseignants évoluent lors de la formation initiale et diffèrent entre les disciplines de spécialisation sont investiguées auprès de quatre cohortes de futurs maîtres du secondaire de deux profils interdisciplinaires. Pour ce faire, un indice global est obtenu à la suite de l’administration d’un questionnaire d’épistémologie personnelle (Hofer, 2000). Il s’en dégage qu’une différence initiale entre les profils s’amenuise entre le début et la fin de la formation. La formation des maîtres contribue ainsi à raffiner les croyances épistémologiques d’étudiants de profils forts différents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMesure et évaluation en éducationSame topicEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesFrench-language works237,207