Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the present study the spatiotemporal trend analysis of the annual maximum dry spell length (AMDSL) and the annual number of dry spell periods (ANDSPs) of Isfahan Province in the center of Iran has been conducted based on daily rainfall records taken from 17 rain gauge stations. The autocorrelation functions (ACFs) of dry spell time series showed the randomness of dry spells. The use of Mann‐Kendall test for trend revealed two stations with significant negative trend of the AMDSL located in east and west of the province. The trend analysis of the ANDSP showed three stations with significant upward trend in east and one station with significant negative trend in the west of the province. The sequential Mann‐Kendall test showed an evidence of an individual abrupt change in the magnitudes of dry spells from 1980s, especially in eastern arid and semi‐arid regions of the province. However, the binomial and uniform distribution of Mann‐Kendall statistics reveals that individual trend in a region is not strong enough to conclude the large‐scale regional climatic effects on dry spell characteristics in the entire Isfahan Province. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".