MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2079200663 · doi:10.1029/2006jf000676

Excess <sup>210</sup>Pb inventories and fluxes along the continental slope and basins of the Gulf of Papua

2008· article· en· W2079200663 on OpenAlexaff
Zahid Muhammad, Samuel J. Bentley, Lawrence A. Febo, André W. Droxler, Gerald R. Dickens, Larry C. Peterson, Bradley N. Opdyke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyContinental shelfOceanographySedimentTurbiditeTurbidity currentSeabedSedimentary rockTrough (economics)Deposition (geology)Flux (metallurgy)Continental marginDeep seaCarbonateSediment transportGeomorphologyStructural basinGeochemistrySedimentary depositional environmentPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sediment samples were collected from continental slopes and marginal basins in the Gulf of Papua and analyzed for excess 210Pb to elucidate transport processes of fine‐ grained particles to this region. Estimated excess 210Pb fluxes of 1.0–12.8 dpm cm−2 a−1 were derived from measured seabed inventories. Highest sediment accumulation rates (0.28–0.35 cm a−1) were measured along the northeastern shelf edge, and they decrease in seaward directions and along isobaths to the southwest. The excess 210Pb flux could result from either focused deposition of high‐210Pb activity sediments from the continental shelf and upper slope or scavenging of 210Pb brought landward from deep‐sea waters. This sediment flux is concentrated in the northeastern Gulf of Papua, where the shelf is narrow and calcium carbonate contents are lowest. Analysis of sedimentary fabric and 210Pb distributions in cores suggests sediment delivery to the slope occurs on a 100‐year timescale as both diffuse hemipelagic deposition as well as turbidity flows. The flux of sediment in turbidity flows is not well constrained but may be producing additional deep‐sea accumulation in the Moresby Trough, as well as export from the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→