MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079213840 · doi:10.1063/1.1496510

Large fully nonlinear internal solitary waves: The effect of background current

2002· article· en· W2079213840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAmplitudeNonlinear systemInternal waveBreaking waveMechanicsCurrent (fluid)InstabilityStratified flowClassical mechanicsShear flowStratified flowsWave propagationQuantum electrodynamicsOpticsTurbulenceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider what effect the presence of a nonconstant background current has on the properties of large, fully nonlinear solitary internal waves in a shallow, stratified ocean. In particular, we discuss how the amplitude of the largest nonbreaking wave that it is possible to calculate depends on the background current as well as the nature of the upper bound. We find that the maximum wave amplitude is given by one of three possibilities: The onset of wave breaking, the conjugate flow amplitude or a failure of the wave calculating algorithm to converge (associated with shear instability). We also discuss how wave properties such as propagation speed, half-width, etc. vary with background current amplitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it