Marché du livre, censure et littérature clandestine dans la France de l’époque napoléonienne : les années 1810-1814
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article, fondé sur les documents produits par la Direction générale de l’imprimerie et de la librairie entre 1810 et 1814, analyse l’univers des écrits non périodiques pendant les dernières années de l’Empire. Le thème central est celui des stratégies de contrôle des imprimés mises au point par le régime et la réaction du monde de la librairie à un système de surveillance qui prétend veiller et gouverner tous les aspects de la production, de la vente, de la circulation et de la « consommation » des imprimés. L’article se propose de mettre en lumière les pratiques illégales et clandestines qui caractérisent chacune de ces étapes, tout en considérant les changements en cours dans la composition du public des lecteurs, dans les pratiques de lecture, dans les goûts et dans les genres littéraires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".