CO2 EMISSIONS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF WELL-INSULATED AND AIRTIGHT HOUSES BASED ON MEASUREMENT SURVEY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CO2emissions from the construction and use of houses have been increasing. In order to promote the reduction of CO2 , it is necessary to know the exact amount of CO2 emissions from houses. First, the authors measured the exact weight of the construction materials and waste. Next, the authors researched the inhabitants' daily schedule and measured the energy consumption from using the house . The following results were obtained.1) The authors discovered the relationship between the energy consumption and the inhabitants' daily schedule.2) The amount of electricity consumed was 30.6GJ/year for the first year and 28.9GJ/year for the second year.3) The amount of CO2 emissions from both the construction and two years use of the house was 389.07kg-CO2/m2.4) The authors recalculated the amount of CO2 emissions into the amount of CO2 emissions per area of ceiling, floor and outer wall to discover the relationship between CO2 emissions from the construction and CO2emissions from use of the house.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".