MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079243358 · doi:10.1039/c3mt20106f

Electroanalysis of the interaction between (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and amyloid-β in the presence of copper

2013· article· en· W2079243358 on OpenAlexafffund
Biao Zhang, Xin Cheng, Iranaldo Santos da Silva, Vinci Wing Sze Hung, Anthony J. Veloso, Lúcio Angnes, Kağan Kerman

Bibliographic record

VenueMetallomics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlzheimer Society
KeywordsChemistryEpigallocatechin gallateGallatePeptidePolyphenolCyclic voltammetryCopperAmyloid (mycology)MetalAmyloid betaBiochemistryBiophysicsElectrochemistryNuclear chemistryAntioxidantInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryBiologyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The misfolding of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide is one of the pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Polyphenols are strong antioxidants and metal chelators, with characteristics that are of beneficial therapeutic values for their development as candidates targeting neurodegenerative and metal-induced diseases. We have demonstrated here the electrochemical properties of a green tea component, (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), and its potent activity on Aβ peptides. Characterization of early interactions (≤48 h) between EGCG and Aβ was conducted using square wave voltammetry (SWV). The interaction of Cu(ii) ions with the Tyr-10 residue of Aβ was shown to be affected by surrounding His residues. Morphological changes due to the binding of EGCG and Cu(II) were also elucidated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Electroanalytical techniques are promising for facilitating the investigation of metals and flavonoids in drug screening studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetallomicsSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207