MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079295573 · doi:10.2174/156802610793176648

Strategies for the Discovery and Advancement of Novel Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides

2010· review· en· W2079295573 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobial peptidesAntimicrobialIn silicoPeptideBiologyCathelicidinComputational biologyMicrobiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-drug resistant bacteria are appearing at an alarming rate and impose significant burdens on healthcare systems worldwide. Cationic peptides have shown great promise as broad spectrum antimicrobial agents with a demonstrated ability to kill resistant bacteria, however, issues such as protease susceptibility and toxicity issues have delayed their clinical development. This review summarizes recent progress in the advancement of cationic antimicrobial peptides for the treatment of bacterial infections. The major focus of the discussion relates to recent advances in the areas of screening and in silico modeling. A selection of novel strategies that diverge from classical linear α-peptide antimicrobials is also discussed. A diverse array of candidate structures will be key to the ultimate development of a stable platform for clinical development. The ability to accurately predict peptide activity in silico and in a high-throughput manner should benefit all classes of cationic antimicrobial peptides and provide a larger set of candidate structures for clinical evaluation. Keywords: Antimicrobial, Cationic, Peptide/kwd, >, QSAR, screening, in silico, Cationic Antimi-crobial Peptides, Multi-drug resistant, broad spectrum, protease susceptibility, Peptide, Gram negative bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Gram-positive, innate immunity, structure activity relationships, host defense pep-tides, glycosaminoglycans, red blood cell hemolysis, lipopolysaccharides, teichoic, zwitterionic lipids, threshold level, nucleic acid synthesis, second-generation peptides, SPOT synthesis technique, luxCDABE-expressing Pseudo-monas aeuruginosa, Bac2a- and Bac2a-, EC50 values, artificial neural network, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, ana-phylatoxin peptide C3a., benchmark peptide LL37, lipids phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol, dipiccolinic acid, linear -peptide antimicrobials, neurokinin derived peptides GKH17 and HKH17, PEGylation of peptides, Polymyxins, cationic cyclic lipopeptides, hydrophobic antibiotics, Peptide Mimics

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it