MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079307673 · doi:10.2118/107201-ms

Realistic History Matching of Cyclic Steam Stimulation Performance of Several Groups of Multilateral Wells in the Peace River Field, Canada

2007· article· en· W2079307673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAll Days · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionPetrophysicsReservoir simulationPermeability (electromagnetism)Relative permeabilityWellheadGeologyOil fieldPorosityPetrologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With 8 billion barrels of bitumen in place and more than 30 years of thermal piloting and demonstration projects, Peace River offers an excellent growth opportunity for Shell's ultraheavy oil portfolio. In support of this initiative, integrated geological and reservoir modeling of two project areas was conducted. The key objectives were to improve predictive modeling capability of cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) projects by history matching two groups of CSS multilateral wells and develop a history matched physical representation that not only validates empirical models but can be deployed to optimize CSS designs for full field development. Detailed geological models were created over two pad areas providing a geological framework large enough to have realistic boundary conditions, including impact of surrounding wells. The geological models were imported into CMG's STARS thermal reservoir simulator, and a relatively fine grid was extended over each project area. All available historical production, injection, pressure and temperature data were used in history matching. Steam-induced reservoir dilation, explicit fracturing, and relative permeability hysteresis were important aspects of the overall physical representation. Common physical parameters for dilation/re-compaction, fractures, permeability/porosity transforms, vertical to horizontal permeability ratios, and relative permeability hysteresis were used for both pads. Each pad area maintained its own unique geological, petrophysical, and fluid properties, in line with observed field trends. Excellent history matches (aided by experimental design) of injection and production volumes, injection wellhead pressures, estimated production bottom-hole pressures and temperature profiles were achieved not only for the entire Pad A and B groups of wells, but also for the individual wells. In summary, a predictive CSS simulation model has been developed and validated by history matching two areas of the Peace River field. The model is suitable for sensitivity studies of geological, petrophysical, and fluid properties. It is also capable of assessing impact of well configuration, spacing, steam quality, and steaming strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it