MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079327376 · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.013816

Theory of a one-atom laser in a photonic band-gap microchip

2004· article· en· W2079327376 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia Florescu, Sajeev John, Tran Quang, Rongzhou Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPhotonResonance fluorescenceCavity quantum electrodynamicsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Quantum opticsPhotonic crystalOpticsDephasingAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantumExcitationOpen quantum system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a quantum theory of a coherently pumped two-level atom in a photonic band gap (PBG), coupled to both a multimode waveguide channel and a high-quality microcavity embedded within a photonic crystal. One mode is engineered to exhibit a sharp cutoff within the PBG, leading to a large discontinuity in the local photon density of states near the atom, and the cavity field mode is resonant with the central component of the Mollow spectrum of atomic resonance fluorescence. Another mode of the waveguide channel is used to propagate the pump beam. We derive analytical expressions for the optical amplitude, intensity, second-order correlation functions, and conjugate quadrature variances for the light emitted by the atom into the microcavity. The quantum degree of second-order coherence in the cavity field reveals enhanced, inversionless, nearly coherent light generation when the photon density of states jump between the Mollow spectral components is large. The cavity field characteristics are highly distinct from that of a corresponding high-$Q$ cavity in ordinary vacuum. In the case of a vanishing photon density of states on the lower Mollow sideband and no dipolar dephasing, the emitted photon statistics is Poissonian, and the cavity field exhibits quadrature coherence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207