MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079357912 · doi:10.1080/17455030802541566

Guided and standing Bloch waves in periodic elastic strips

2009· article· en· W2079357912 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel D.M. Adams, Richard V. Craster, Sébastien Guenneau

Bibliographic record

VenueWaves in Random and Complex Media · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilDefence Science and Technology Laboratory
KeywordsFloquet theoryBloch waveBrillouin zoneWaveguideDispersion relationOpticsMaxima and minimaPhysicsJumpDispersion (optics)Mathematical analysisPlane waveMathematicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elastic waveguiding structures are investigated for guides constructed of periodically alternating media thereby forming a striped waveguide. The guide has finite width with either homogeneous traction-free or clamped boundary conditions on the guide walls, or a combination of these. The band spectrum and associated Floquet–Bloch eigensolutions for these in-plane elastic waveguides are identified. Several features of this guiding structure emerge, and are of interest; in some cases a total stop band at zero frequency is identified providing space for low frequency localized modes: such modes also appear when we create defects in the structured waveguide. The dispersion curves often have maxima and minima of the spectral edges far from the edges of the Brillouin zone and these are related to slow sound or standing waves within the structure. Numerical and asymptotic techniques are developed and discussed, the latter are based on weak contrast, and weak geometric changes, or utilize jump conditions in limits where one medium is thin relative to the other. There are technological applications that could utilize this theory and we demonstrate that imaging is possible using anomalous dispersion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaves in Random and Complex MediaSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207