MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079372207 · doi:10.1109/mitp.2014.78

The Next Step for Learning Analytics

2014· article· en· W2079372207 on OpenAlexaff
Jinan Fiaidhi

Bibliographic record

VenueIT Professional · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLearning analyticsAnalyticsComputer scienceData scienceSoftware analyticsData analysisCultural analyticsBig dataBusiness intelligenceBusiness analyticsSemantic analyticsWeb analyticsWorld Wide WebKnowledge managementData miningWeb intelligenceThe InternetSoftwareManagementSoftware development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Use of learning analytics in real-world educational applications is growing as academic institutions realize its potential, especially in dealing with the exponential growth of unstructured data. Adding text analytics to learning analytics applications is particularly appealing, because most of the unstructured data dealt with in academia involves text. This article discusses the importance of using textual analytics within the paradigm of learning analytics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0200.044
Open science0.0040.013
Research integrity0.0080.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIT ProfessionalSame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207