High pressure saturation of hydrogen stored by single-wall carbon nanotubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the early report of adsorption on single-walled carbon nanotubes in 1997, a number of controversial publications have claimed the hydrogen capacity of these materials to be between 0.1 and 10.0 wt %. However, no study has yet demonstrated a plateau of adsorption with pressure that is consistent with monolayer saturation. Others have suggested that the tube bundle structure expand under high pressure to enable higher adsorption on newly uncovered surfaces, but received no confirmation. Using a high-pressure instrument with in situ electrical probes, we found that a plateau is nearly achieved at about 300 atm in the room temperature isotherm. And that nanotube bundles do not expand or swell, shown by the in situ electrical measurements of purified single-walled nanotube (SWNT) bundles. The monolayer saturation plateau was found on bundled SWNT at room temperature corresponding to an adsorption of 0.9 wt %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".