A nonparametric multivariate multisample test based on data depth
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we construct a family of nonparametric multivariate multisample tests based on depth rankings. These tests are of Kruskal-Wallis type in the sense that the samples are variously ordered. However, unlike the Kruskal-Wallis test, these tests are based upon a depth ranking using a statistical depth function such as the halfspace depth or the Mahalanobis depth, etc. The types of tests we propose are adapted to the depth function that is most appropriate for the application. Under the null hypothesis that all samples come from the same distribution, we show that the test statistic asymptotically has a chi-square distribution. Some comparisons of power are made with the Hotelling T2, and the test of Choi and Marden (1997). Our test is particularly recommended when the data are of unknown distribution type where there is some evidence that the density contours are not elliptical. However, when the data are normally distributed, we often obtain high relative power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it