MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079458464 · doi:10.1021/jp811085c

Where is Electronic Energy Stored in Adenosine Triphosphate?

2009· article· en· W2079458464 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenosine triphosphateChemistryATP hydrolysisGroup (periodic table)PhosphateComputational chemistryAtomic physicsChemical physicsPhysicsEnzymeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gas-phase electronic energy of the hydrolysis of methyl triphosphate, a model of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), is partitioned into local (atomic and group) contributions. A modified definition of Lipmann's "group transfer potential" is proposed on the basis of the partitioning of the total electronic energy into atomic contributions within the framework of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). The group transfer potential is defined here as the sum of the atomic energies forming the group in ATP minus the sum of the energies of the same atoms in inorganic phosphate. It is found that the transfer potential of the terminal phosphate group in ATP is significantly reduced, from +241.7 to +73.1 kcal/mol, as a result of complexation with magnesium. This is accompanied by a concomitant change in the energy of reaction from -168.6 to -24.9 kcal/mol. Regions within ATP where the electronic energy changes the most upon hydrolysis are identified. The study is conducted at the DFT/B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it