Thermal effects on Farley–Buneman waves at nonzero aspect and flow angles. I. Dispersion relation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasingly accepted notion that E-region electrostatic plasma waves move at their instability threshold speed when they attain their maximum amplitude, it has become more important to determine just what that threshold speed is supposed to be. An accurate determination requires a calculation of the electron temperature fluctuation level, which can sometimes dramatically influence the results. In this paper, the Grad 8-moment transport equations have been employed with the addition of a generalized electron cooling rate to account for cooling via inelastic collisions, and a general electron volume heating rate that includes frictional heating as a special case. The derived generalized dispersion relation is presented in such a way that a variety of other earlier treatments, including the isothermal and adiabatic limits and an instability associated with electron friction, all fall out transparently, allowing us to easily compare our results with earlier ones while tracking down the physical processes involved. The presentation format is also geared to facilitate the computation of the dispersion relation for the purpose of comparing the theoretical results with observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".