MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079482348 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.020

Roles of Transforming Growth Factor-β in Graft-versus-Host and Graft-versus-Tumor Effects

2012· review· en· W2079482348 on OpenAlexaff
Cédric Carli, Martin Giroux, Jean‐Sébastien Delisle

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlloimmunityTransforming growth factorMedicinePathophysiologyImmunologyTransplantationCytokineImmune systemHaematopoiesisGraft-versus-host diseaseCancer researchStem cellCell biologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is a pleiotropic cytokine with widespread and profound effects on immune cells. Consequently, it has generated considerable interest in relation to the immunologic outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The TGF-β pathway has been shown to be an important modulator of alloimmunity, with direct consequences on graft-versus-host disease pathophysiology and graft-versus-tumor response. The TGF-β-related effects can be both beneficial and detrimental to the host, underscoring the complexity of TGF-β biology. This article reviews the evidence linking TGF-β to alloimmune responses in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and highlights foreseeable strategies that would maximize the beneficial effects of TGF-β pathway modulation on both graft-versus-host disease pathophysiology and the graft-versus-tumor effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207