Intrathecal Versus IV Fentanyl in Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Systemic large-dose opioids are widely used in pediatric cardiac anesthesia, but there are no randomized, prospective studies regarding the use of intrathecal (IT) opioids for these procedures. In this randomized, prospective study, we compared cardiovascular and neurohumoral responses during IT or IV fentanyl anesthesia for pediatric cardiac surgery. Thirty children aged 6 mo to 6 yr were anesthetized with an IV fentanyl bolus of 10 micro g/kg. This was followed by a fentanyl infusion of 10 micro g. kg(-1). h(-1) (Group IV; n = 10), 2 micro g/kg of IT fentanyl (Group IT; n = 10), or combined IV and IT protocols (Group IV + IT; n = 10). Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, additional fentanyl doses, time to first analgesic requirement, COMFORT and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores, and extubation time were recorded. Blood cortisol, insulin, glucose, and lactate levels were measured presurgery, poststernotomy, during the rewarming phase of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and 6 and 24 h after surgery. The patients' urinary cortisol excretion rates were also measured during the first postoperative day. The findings in all three groups were statistically similar, except for higher blood glucose levels during CPB in Group IT compared with Group IV (P < 0.004). Group IV + IT was the only group in which the increases in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure from presurgery to poststernotomy were not significant. The 24-h urinary cortisol excretion rates ( micro g. kg(-1). d(-1)) were 61.51 +/- 39, 92.54 +/- 67.55, and 40.15 +/- 29.69 for Groups IV, IT, and IV + IT, respectively (P > 0.05). A single IT injection of fentanyl 2 micro g/kg offers no advantage over systemic fentanyl (10 micro g/kg bolus and 10 micro g. kg(-1). h(-1)) with regard to hemodynamic stability or suppression of stress response. The combination of these two regimens may provide better hemodynamic stability during the pre-CPB period and may be associated with a decreased 24-h urinary cortisol excretion rate. IMPLICATIONS: In this prospective, randomized study, we investigated the adequacy of a single intrathecal injection of fentanyl for intraoperative analgesia, compared the effects of IT and IV fentanyl on stress response, and assessed for an additive effect of IT and IV fentanyl administration in pediatric cardiac anesthesia. The results with these three different anesthetic regimens were similar regarding anesthesia depth and level of stress response. However, the combination of IT and IV routes may provide better hemodynamic stability and a less pronounced stress response, as reflected by 24-h urinary cortisol excretion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".