MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079517179 · doi:10.1109/eumc.2005.1610060

FDFD modeling of substrate integrated waveguide without phase-bias

2005· article· en· W2079517179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2005 European Microwave Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorWaveguideSubstrate (aquarium)Dimension (graph theory)Electronic circuitMaterials scienceFinite-difference time-domain methodIntegrated circuitPhase (matter)Electronic engineeringOptoelectronicsComputer scienceOpticsMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a finite difference frequency domain (FDFD) method is used to analyze a new class of substrate integrated waveguides (SIW) that are formed by using periodic metallic slots instead of metallic vias. When the gaps between slots are small enough, the broadside dimension of their equivalent rectangular waveguide is approximately equal to the spacing between inner walls of the slots. This means that the design of substrate integrated waveguide circuits (a family of substrate integrated circuits or SICs) such as resonators and filters based on the SIW concept can greatly be simplified. A new FDFD algorithm is proposed to analyze the substrate integrated waveguide resonators. Combining with a perfectly matched layer (PML) technique, the FDFD algorithm based on Maxwell's equations is extended and can be used to analyze open resonant problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it