MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079525116 · doi:10.1021/bi048039u

Structural Characterization of Type II Dockerin Module from the Cellulosome of <i>Clostridium thermocellum</i>:  Calcium-Induced Effects on Conformation and Target Recognition

2005· article· en· W2079525116 on OpenAlexaff
Jarrett Adams, Bradley A. Webb, Holly L. Spencer, Steven P. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium thermocellumCellulosomeCohesinChemistryProtein subunitBiochemistryCalciumProtein structureBiophysicsBiologyDNACelluloseChromatinGeneCellulase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The assembly of a functional cellulose-degrading complex termed the cellulosome involves two specific calcium-dependent cohesin-dockerin interactions: type I and type II. Extensive structural and mutagenesis studies have been performed on the type I modules and their interaction in an attempt to identify the underlying molecular determinants responsible for this specificity. However, very little structural information exists for the type II interaction. We have performed a variety of biophysical studies on the type II dockerin-X-module modular pair (DocX), which comprises the C-terminal region of cellulosomal scaffoldin subunit from Clostridium thermocellum, to determine the effect of calcium on its structure and interaction with type II cohesin. Our results indicate that calcium binding to type II dockerin occurs with an apparent dissociation constant (K(d)) of 7 microM, induces stable secondary and tertiary structure, and leads to the exposure of a hydrophobic surface. Calcium binding also results in the homodimerization of DocX. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments indicate that the DocX homodimer has an elongated shape and a K(d) of approximately 40 microM. However, addition of the SdbA type II cohesin binding partner led to the dissociation of the DocX homodimer and to the formation of a 1:1 heterodimer. We propose that the exposed hydrophobic surface forms, at least in part, the type II cohesin-binding site, which in the absence of cohesin results in the dimerization of DocX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsFrench-language works237,207