MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079569562 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3915

Piecewise linear perturbations of a linear center

2013· article· en· W2079569562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiecewise linear functionPerturbation (astronomy)Upper and lower boundsMonotone polygonSingular perturbationMathematicsMathematical analysisSigmaAnnulus (botany)Center (category theory)PhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is mainly devoted to the study of the limit cycles that can bifurcate from a linearcenter usinga piecewise linear perturbation in two zones. We consider the case when the two zones are separatedby a straight line $\Sigma$ and the singular point of the unperturbed system is in $\Sigma$. It isproved that the maximum number of limit cycles that can appear up to a seventh order perturbation isthree. Moreover this upper bound is reached. This result confirms that these systems have more limitcycles than it was expected. Finally, center and isochronicity problems are also studied in systemswhich include a first order perturbation. For the latter systems it is also proved that,when theperiod function, defined in the period annulus of the center, is not monotone, then it has at mostone critical period. Moreover this upper bound is also reached.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it