Morphological and phylogenetic comparisons of <i>Neodenticula seminae</i> (Bacillariophyta) populations between the subarctic Pacific and the Gulf of St. Lawrence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neodenticula seminae is a very important member of modern diatom assemblages in the Bering Sea and at middle to high latitudes of the North Pacific. In the North Atlantic, this species was considered extinct until it was recorded in high abundance in the 2001 spring phytoplankton bloom of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Eastern Canada. Here, we discuss some of the most distinctive features of its morphology, including variation in some characters between the subarctic Pacific and the Gulf of St. Lawrence specimens. Most importantly, we observed that the deck and basal ridges, and the solid-walled costae (formerly known as primary pseudosepta) characteristic of N. seminae were present in the subarctic Pacific material, but were absent or vestigial in the Gulf of St. Lawrence material and in cultures from both regions. This morphological variation was most likely due to differences in physico–chemical water properties between the subarctic Pacific and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Phylogenetic analyses of the internal transcribed spacer regions of the nuclear ribosomal DNA showed that the strains of N. seminae collected in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the subarctic Pacific clustered in two sister clades, but differed from each other only slightly more than the variation among the subarctic Pacific strains. These results confirmed the reappearance of N. seminae in the NW Atlantic after an absence of ∼0.8 Ma. In addition, the phylogenetic analyses based on the large subunit of the nuclear ribosomal DNA positioned N. seminae firmly within the Bacillariaceae (i.e. diatoms with a fibulate raphe system) and proved a close relationship to species of Fragilariopsis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".