MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Elastic properties of solid helium

2009· article· en· W2079621211 on OpenAlexafffund
O. Syshchenko, James Day, John Beamish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Cancer Research Institute
KeywordsSupersolidShear modulusMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsBulk modulusModulusPhase (matter)PhysicsComposite materialPhase diagramQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following recent torsional oscillator measurements which appear to show the 'non-classical rotational inertia' which characterizes a supersolid, a number of experiments have searched for evidence of unusual behavior in other properties. We have developed a new technique for measuring the shear modulus of solid helium at low frequencies and small strains. In hexagonal close packed (4)He, the shear modulus increases dramatically below 200 mK, the temperature range where decoupling is seen in torsional oscillators. The modulus anomaly is frequency independent, depends strongly on strain amplitude, and is very sensitive to (3)He impurities. In these and other ways, the shear modulus closely mirrors the torsional oscillator behavior and it is clear that the two phenomena are closely related. We attribute the shear modulus effects to the elastic response of mobile dislocations and their pinning by (3)He impurities at low temperatures. A question then arises: are the modulus increases responsible for the frequency changes seen in torsional oscillator experiments? The expected frequency shifts appear to be much too small to explain the apparent decoupling, nor can elastic effects explain the 'blocked annulus' results or the behavior in small pores. In order to clarify the relationship between the shear modulus and torsional oscillator behaviors, we have recently made modulus measurements on (3)He, where no supersolid response is expected. Since dislocation motion depends on crystal structure it was important that these measurements be extended to the hexagonal close packed phase of (3)He, not just the body centered cubic phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207