MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079632316 · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n2p19

Characterization of the Angular Leaf Spot Resistance Gene Present in Common Bean Cultivar Ouro Negro

2013· article· en· W2079632316 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Demerson Arruda Sanglard, Carlos Ribeiro, Bruno Balbi, Klever Márcio Antunes Arruda, Everaldo Gonçalves de Barros, Maurílio Alves Moreira

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsBiologyCultivarIntrogressionGermplasmLeaf spotLocus (genetics)Resistance (ecology)Plant disease resistanceGeneBotanyHorticultureGeneticsAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angular leaf spot (ALS), incited by the fungus Pseudocercospora griseola, is a major disease affecting common bean. Important resistance sources have been identified and characterized: AND 277, BAT 332, Cornell 49-242, MAR-2, and Mexico 54. P. griseola presents high physiological variability. The control of this kind of pathogen requires continuous evaluation, including monitoring and characterization of pathogenic variability, and eventual germplasm introgression of genes in adapted cultivars. Cultivar Ouro Negro is currently being used as an ALS resistance source in Brazil. This work aimed to characterize the ALS resistance gene present in cultivar Ouro Negro in relation to the other five resistance sources. These cultivars were crossed with ‘Ouro Negro’ (allelism tests) and with susceptible cv. Rudá (inheritance studies) and their segregation patterns were evaluated. The inheritance studies and the allelism tests indicate that ‘Ouro Negro’ harbors at least one resistance locus which is distinct from those present in the other resistance sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207