MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W207964087 · doi:10.1522/030350101

Interventions de collaboration ecole-famille menees par des enseignants du primaire pour prevenir le decrochage scolaire d'eleves presentant des facteurs de risque familiaux /

2012· book· fr· W207964087 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joëlle Duval

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La littérature scientifique rend compte que le décrochage scolaire est un long processus trouvant son origine dès le primaire et que la famille représente un facteur de risque lui étant associé. Toutefois, la collaboration école-famille (EF) serait un moyen à privilégier pour le prévenir, et la responsabilité d'organiser des interventions de collaboration EF incomberait, entre autres, aux enseignants. Comme la mise en application de la collaboration EF est très peu précisée dans les écrits scientifiques, cette recherche souhaitait participer à pallier ce manque de connaissance. C'est pourquoi deux objectifs de recherche ont été fixés : 1) répertorier des interventions de collaboration EF menées par des enseignants du primaire qui tiennent compte des facteurs familiaux; 2) décrire les conditions de mise en application de ces interventions. La méthode qualitative a donc été utilisée pour décrire et comprendre ce phénomène peu exploré dans les écrits scientifiques. Pour ce faire, 10 enseignantes oeuvrant, depuis au moins 2 ans, dans des écoles primaires situées au Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean et dans les Laurentides ont été recrutées. Les enseignantes ont d'abord répondu à un questionnaire portant sur le décrochage scolaire, la collaboration EF et leurs interventions de collaboration EF. Ensuite, une entrevue semi-dirigée, dont le guide d'entrevue était issu du cadre conceptuel et de l'analyse du questionnaire préalablement répondu, a complété la collecte de données. Puis, l'analyse inductive générale des données qualitatives a permis de dégager les interventions de collaboration EF menées par ces enseignantes, de même que les conditions à poursuivre et à instaurer concernant leur mise en application. Ensuite, elle a permis de constater que, malgré le fait que les enseignantes soient capables d'identifier des élèves à risque de décrocher dans un futur rapproché auxquels elles enseignent et qu'elles comprennent qu'elles ont un rôle à jouer quant à la prévention du décrochage scolaire, en général, elles ne mènent que rarement des interventions de collaboration EF en lien avec les facteurs familiaux associés au décrochage scolaire. En fait, uniquement 2 des 14 facteurs familiaux voient des interventions menées fréquemment ou occasionnellement, c'est-à-dire plus d'une fois par année, alors que les 12 autres font rarement l'objet d'interventions, soit une fois par année ou par deux ans. Des recommandations découlent donc de l'interprétation de ces résultats : 1) des propositions de formations et de recherches portant sur la collaboration EF, la prévention du décrochage scolaire et le rôle de mentor en matière de collaboration EF afin que puisse s'opérer un changement de paradigme où la culture professionnelle reconnaitrait le rôle des parents et faciliterait leur participation; 2) la proposition d'inclure la communauté par une approche périscolaire qui se combinerait à l'approche scolaire déjà existante afin que la collaboration EF et la prévention du décrochage scolaire soient optimisées. C'est donc un changement de paradigme qui doit ultimement s'opérer afin que la culture professionnelle des écoles puisse influencer le sentiment d'autoefficacité des enseignants, de même que leur compréhension du rôle qu'ils ont à jouer dans la collaboration EF en lien avec la prévention du décrochage scolaire. Scientific literature notices that dropping out from school is a long process that is detected as soon as elementary school. In fact, the family issue is a risk factor well associated with school dropout. However, to prevent this, school-family collaboration would be a privileged means to prevent school dropout. However, the responsibility would mostly rely on the teachers to organize school-family collaboration interventions. Since the enforcement of the school-family collaboration is very little mentioned in scientific writings, this research wished to palliate the lack of knowledge, this is the reason why two research objectives have been set as a target: 1) list school-family collaboration interventions that consider family factors, conducted by elementary teachers; 2) describe the interventions' enforcement conditions. The qualitative method has therefore been used to describe and understand this phenomenon that has been very little explored in scientific writings. To do this, 10 elementary teachers, that have been teaching for at least 2 years in the same school, from the Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean and the Laurentian regions' in Quebec, Canada, have been recruited. Firstly, the teachers answered a questionnaire on school dropout, on school-family collaboration, and on school-family collaboration interventions. Next, a semi-directed interview was conducted, the interview guide was stemming from a conceptual frame and from the questionnaire analysis that was answered previously. Then, the general inductive analysis of the qualitative data directed by the researcher, allowed to clear the schoolfamily collaboration interventions, as well as the conditions to be pursued and to be established for them to be applied. Afterwards, the interview permitted to show that despite the fact that the teachers were able to identify the students that were at risk of dropping out of school in the near future, and that these teachers fully understand that they do have a role to play in the prevention of school dropout, in general, these teachers do rarely make school-family collaboration interventions in connection with the family factors associated to school dropout. Actually, only 2 of the 14 family factors see frequent or occasional interventions, i.e. more than once per year, while the other 12 are rarely the subject of interventions, namely once a year or once every two years. Some recommendations arise from the results of the interpretation: 1) training and research propositions on school-family collaboration, the prevention of school dropout and the mentor role with regards to school-family collaboration so that a paradigm change may occur, where the professional culture could recognize the parents' role and as well would facilitate their participation; 2) the proposition to include the community with an extracurricular approach that would combine itself to the school approach already in existence so that the school-family collaboration and the prevention of dropping out of school could be optimized. It is therefore ultimately desirable to obtain a paradigm shift so that the professional school culture can influence the teachers' sense of self-efficacy, as well as their comprehension of the role they have to play in the school-family collaboration in link with the prevention of school dropout.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207