Neuroprotective Role of Astrocytic Gap Junctions in Ischemic Stroke
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of astrocytic gap junctions in ischemia remains controversial. Several studies support that astrocytic gap junctions play a role in the spread of hypoxic injury, while other reports have demonstrated that blocking astrocytic gap junctions increases neuronal death. Using a stroke model on animals in which the astrocytic gap junction protein connexin43 (Cx43) was compromised, we explored the neuroprotective role of astrocytic gap junctions. A focal brain stroke was performed on heterozygous Cx43 null [Cx43(+/-)] mice, wild type [Cx43(+/+)] mice, astrocyte-directed Cx43 deficient [Cx43(fl/ fl)/hGFAP-cre] mice (here designated as Cre(+) mice), and their corresponding controls [Cx43(fl/fl)] (here designated as Cre(-) mice). Four days following stroke, ischemic lesions were measured for size and analyzed immunohistochemically. Stroke volume was significantly larger in Cx43(+/-) and Cre(+) mice compared to Cx43(+/+) and Cre(-) mice, respectively. Apoptosis as detected by TUNEL labeling and caspase-3 immunostaining was amplified in Cx43(+/-) and Cre(+) mice compared to their control groups. Furthermore, increased inflammation as characterized by the immunohistochemical staining of the microglial marker CD11b was observed in the Cre(+) mice penumbra. Astrocytic gap junctions may reduce apoptosis and inflammation in the penumbra following ischemic insult, suggesting that coupled astrocytes fulfill a neuroprotective role under ischemic stroke conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it