Controlled group V intermixing in InGaAsP quantum well structures and its application to the fabrication of two section tunable lasers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the technique of controlled group V quantum well intermixing (QWI) in a compressively strained In0.76Ga0.24As0.85P0.15/In0.76Ga0.24As0.52P0.48 multiquantum well laser structure and its application to the fabrication of two-section tunable lasers. The blueshift of the band-gap energy was enhanced by capping the samples with films of SiO2 or low-temperature grown InP, while suppressed by a SixNy film with a refractive index of about 2.1. Spatially selective band-gap tuning was achieved by patterning the dielectric film into dot and strip arrays with different surface coverage. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectra showed that the enhanced blueshift was caused by the interdiffusion of group V atoms between the quantum wells and barriers. A group V interstitial interdiffusion mechanism is proposed for the sample capped with SiO2 and this is supported by the even more efficient intermixing induced by low-temperature InP, which contains a high concentration of excess phosphorus. A two-section tunable laser operating around 1.55 μm was fabricated using this QWI technology. A tuning range of about 10 nm was demonstrated by simply changing the current injected into the phase tuning section.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it