MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079668891 · doi:10.1002/pc.22812

Evaluating different alkyl ammonium modified organoclays in preparation of TPO nanocomposites with supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>

2013· article· en· W2079668891 on OpenAlexaff
J. Liu, Michael R. Thompson, William R. Rodgers

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Composites · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganoclayMaterials scienceNanocompositeExfoliation jointMontmorilloniteSupercritical fluidAlkylComposite materialPolyolefinChemical engineeringPolymerAmmonium bromidePulmonary surfactantOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryGraphene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the chemical structures of the surfactants associated with organically modified montmorillonites in order to understand how differences in the structure may influence the final properties of the nanocomposite materials. Five organically modified montmorillonites with different surfactants were examined in materials prepared using a novel technique for thermoplastic polyolefin nanocomposites, using supercritical CO 2 as a processing aid. The chain length and the number of alkyl chains attached to the quaternary ammonium surfactant were the main variables of study aimed at changing the interactions of an organoclay with compatibilizer and/or polymer matrix due to the CO 2 treatment. The goal of this work was to improve the exfoliation of the dispersed organoclay. The intermediate masterbatch containing organoclay and compatibilizer as well as the final TPO nanocomposites were characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and rheological analysis. The results showed that of the systems tested, significant changes in the state of exfoliation after processing with the supercritical fluid occurred only for surfactants possessing dialkyl tails and exhibiting a paraffin type arrangement within the montmorillonite. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:1592–1602, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer CompositesSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207