MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079675090 · doi:10.1109/mias.2014.2345833

Risk Management and Electrical Safety: Implementation of an Occupational Health and Safety Management System

2015· article· en· W2079675090 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Industry Applications Magazine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsSchneider Electric (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandardizationOccupational hygieneRisk managementRisk analysis (engineering)Occupational safety and healthManagement systemRisk assessmentEngineeringSystem safetyBusinessEngineering managementOperations managementComputer scienceReliability engineeringComputer securityMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Occupational health and safety management system (OHSMS) standards, such as American National Standards Institute/American Industrial Hygiene Association (ANSI/AIHA) Z10, provide a framework for an employer to manage and continuously improve occupational health and safety (OHS) performance. The risk-management principles of International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standard 31000:2009 adhere to the iterative approach of, and are foundational to, OHSMS standards. They provide a systematic methodology to identify hazards, analyze and evaluate risk, and apply risk-control methods. This article discusses the integration of OHSMS and risk-management principles into electrical safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Industry Applications MagazineSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207