MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079676414 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2012.6389274

Cyclostationarity analysis of instantaneous angular speeds for monitoring chatter in high speed milling

2012· preprint· en· W2079676414 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Lamraoui, Marc Thomas, Mohamed El Badaoui, François Girardin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCyclostationary processMachiningSIGNAL (programming language)Angular velocityProcess (computing)EncoderEngineeringAcousticsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligencePhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of chatter is crucial in machining process and its monitoring is a key issue, so as to insure a better surface quality, to increase productivity and to protect both the machine and the workpiece. An investigation of chatter monitoring in high speed machining process on the basis of cyclostationary analysis of the instantaneous angular speeds is presented in this paper. Experimental cutting tests were carried out on slot milling operations of aluminum alloy. Our experimental set-up allows for the measurement of instantaneous angular speed by using the signal delivered by the standard encoder mounted on the spindle motors. Monitoring chatter in high speed milling, made particularly call to the cyclostationary character of instantaneous angular speeds signals. The cyclostationarity appears on average properties (first order) of signals and on the energetic properties (second order). We show the importance of the utilization of these two kinds of cyclostationarity, particularly to distinguish between stable and unstable machining conditions. The results show that stable machining generates only very few cyclostationary components of second order. The appearance of the chatter, which is characterized by unstable, chaotic motion of the tool and by a strong anomalous fluctuations of cutting forces, makes growing strongly the level of cyclostationary components of second order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207