MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079684230 · doi:10.1139/l10-021

Long-term behaviour model of skid resistance for asphalt roadway surfaces

2010· article· en· W2079684230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tomás Echaveguren, Hernán de Solminihac, Alondra Chamorro

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileUniversidad de Chile
KeywordsSkid (aerodynamics)AsphaltPolishingEquivalence (formal languages)Traffic volumeGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringMathematicsMaterials scienceTransport engineeringComposite materialMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skid resistance (SR) is relevant to road safety. Several researchers have showed that SR diminishes its value over time depending on the traffic-aggregated interactions, and the presence of heavy vehicles in the traffic stream. The classical SR model shows that its value drops from a starting value to an equilibrium value over time. However, this behaviour in low-volume roads is not entirely true. In this paper, an SR model in a single mathematic specification is proposed, which considers the polishing effect of heavy traffic through the polishing equivalence factor. The model was calibrated by using data measured with a SCRIM device from 1100 test sections in Chile. Considering speed and temperature factors calibrated for Chile, data were processed and corrected. It was concluded that the model for long-term behaviour of SR is satisfactory, but it is necessary to include the seasonal effects for a more realistic model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207