Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur Viaggio in Italia (1954) de Roberto Rossellini. L’auteur montre que l’enjeu principal de ce film consiste à démonter et remonter, par un jeu subtil de réfractions et de mise en abîme, l’idée et la pratique de l’héritage, de la transmission d’une tradition (en passant par la tradition des voyages en Italie ), et ce, à partir d’une rhétorique de l’écart et du faux-raccord, de la survivance, en creux, du passé dans les ruines du temps. Le sens de ce qui reste, alors, devient le sens d’une perte de sens du monde qui révèle dans sa complexité ce qui a été perdu. Si l’on peut parler de transmission et d’héritage ici, ce n’est qu’en relisant cette perte de sens comme ce dont on hérite et qui serait à redécouvrir continûment. C’est en ceci que Rossellini, avec ce film, pose les premières pierres d’un cinéma moderne qui tentera, depuis, d’en transmettre l’héritage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it