L’aperception de soi chez Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī et l'héritage avicennien*
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avicenne (mort en 1037) a légué à la tradition philosophique arabe une aporie : la connaissance de soi est conçue, tantôt en termes d’intellection, tantôt en termes d’aperception. Dans le Livre des discussions et le Livre des notes , Avicenne discute longuement d’une conception d’aperception de soi, définie comme mode de connaissance ontologique directe. Héritier de cette tradition, Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī (mort en 1191) s’éloignera de la première conception d’une conscience de soi en termes d’intellection pour reprendre la seconde conception d’une aperception de soi en termes d’une perception directe, intuitive et « présentielle ( ḥuḍūrī ) », et qu’il défendra au moyen de quatre types d’argument.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it