MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079723891 · doi:10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.049

The Origin of Laurentia: Rae Craton as the Backstop for Proto-Laurentian Amalgamation by Slab Suction

2014· article· en· W2079723891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaurentiaCratonGeologySupercontinentPaleontologyBalticaOrogenyDownwellingArcheanTectonicsOrdovicianUpwellingOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proto-Laurentia (i.e. pre-Grenvillian Laurentia) is an aggregate of six or more formerly independent Archean cratons that amalgamated convulsively in geons 19 and 18 (Orosirian Period), along with non-uniformly distributed areas of juvenile Paleoproterozoic crust. Subduction polarities and collision ages have been provisionally inferred between the major cratons (and some minor ones), most recently between the Rae and Hearne cratons. The oldest Orosirian collisions bound the Rae craton: 1.97 Ga (Taltson-Thelon orogen) in the west, and 1.92 Ga (Snowbird orogen) in the southeast. All other Orosirian collision ages in proto-Laurentia are < 1.88 Ga. The Rae craton was the upper plate during (asynchronous) plate convergence at its western and, tentatively, southeastern margins. Subsequent plate convergence in the Wopmay and Trans-Hudson orogens was complex, with the Rae craton embedded in the lower plate prior to the first accretion events (Calderian, Reindeer and Foxe orogenies), but in the upper plate during major subsequent convergence and terminal collisions, giving rise to the Great Bear and Cumberland magmatic arcs, respectively. The ‘orthoversion’ theory of supercontinental succession postulates that supercontinents amalgamate over geoidal lows within a meridional girdle of mantle downwellings, orthogonal to the lingering superswell at the site of the former supercontinent. If the downwelling nodes develop through positive feedback from the descent of cold oceanic slabs, then viscous traction should contribute to drawing the cratons together over the downwelling node. Viewed in this way, the Rae craton was the first to settle over the downwelling node and became the backstop for the other cratons that were drawn towards it by subduction. It was, literally, the origin of Laurentia. Whether the Rae craton was also the origin of Nuna, the hypothetical cogenetic supercontinent, depends on ages and subduction polarities of Orosirian sutures beyond proto-Laurentia.SOMMAIRELa proto-Laurentie (c.-à-d. la Laurentie pré-grenvillienne) est un agrégat d’au moins six cratons archéens indépendants qui se sont amalgamés convulsivement durant les géons 19 et 18 (Orosirien), le long de zones de croûtes juvéniles paléoprotérozoïques réparties de manière hétérogène. Les polarités de subduction et les âges de collision entre les grands cratons (et d’autres moins grands) ont été provisoirement déduits, le plus récemment entre le craton de Rae et le craton de Hearne. Les plus anciennes collisions orosiriennes ont soudé le craton de Rae : 1,97 Ga (orogène de Taltson-Thelon) dans l’ouest, et 1,92 Ga (orogène de Snowbird) dans le sud-est. Tous les autres âges de collision en proto-Laurentie sont inférieurs à 1,88 Ga. Le craton de Rae constituait la plaque supérieure durant la convergence de plaque (asynchrone) à sa marge ouest, et peut-être aussi à ses marges sud-est. La convergence de plaque subséquente dans les orogènes de Wopmay et Trans-Hudson a été complexe, le craton de Rae étant encastré dans la plaque inférieure avant les premiers événements d’accrétion (orogènes caldérienne, de Reindeer et de Fox), puis dans la plaque supérieure durant la grande convergence subséquente et les collisions terminales, ce qui a créé les arcs magmatiques de Great Bear et de Cumberland respectivement. La théorie de « l’orthoversion » de la succession des supercontinents présuppose que les supercontinents s’amalgament au-dessus de creux géoïdaux en deça d’une gaine méridienne de convections mantéliques descendantes, à angle droit d’un super-renflement persistant au site d’un ancien supercontinent. Si le nœud de convection descendante s’établit par rétroaction positive de la descente de plaques océaniques froides, la traction visqueuse devrait contribuer à entraîner les cratons ensembles au-dessus du nœud de convection descendante. Vu de cette façon, le craton de Rae a été le premier à s’établir au-dessus du nœud de convection descendante, ce qui en a fait la butée des autres cratons entraînés par la subduction. Littéralement, telle a été l’origine de la Laurentie. Quant à savoir si c’est le craton de Rae qui a été à l’origine de Nuna, cet hypothétique surpercontinent cogénétique, cela dépend des âges et des polarités de subduction des sutures orosiriennes au-delà de la proto-Laurentie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it