MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079724496 · doi:10.1152/jn.01218.2005

Distinctive Glycinergic Currents With Fast and Slow Kinetics in Thalamus

2006· article· en· W2079724496 on OpenAlexaff
Amer A. Ghavanini, David A. Mathers, Hee‐Soo Kim, E. Puil

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalamusNeuroscienceGlycine receptorPsychologyComputer scienceCommunicationChemistryGlycine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined functional properties of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) evoked by medial lemniscal stimulation, spontaneous IPSCs (sIPSCs), and single-channel, extrasynaptic currents evoked by glycine receptor agonists or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in rat ventrobasal thalamus. We identified synaptic currents by reversal at E(Cl) and sensitivity to elimination by strychnine, GABA(A) antagonists, or combined application. Glycinergic IPSCs featured short (about 12 ms) and long (about 80 ms) decay time constants. These fast and slow IPSCs occurred separately with monoexponential decays, or together with biexponential decay kinetics. Glycinergic sIPSCs decayed monoexponentially with time constants, matching fast and slow IPSCs. These findings were consistent with synaptic responses generated by two populations of glycine receptors, localized under different nerve terminals. Glycine, taurine, or beta-alanine applied to excised membrane patches evoked short- and long-duration current bursts. Extrasynaptic burst durations resembled fast and slow IPSC time constants. The single, intermediate time constant (about 22 ms) of GABA(A)ergic IPSCs cotransmitted with glycinergic IPSCs approximated the burst duration of extrasynaptic GABA(A) channels. We noted differences between synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors. Endogenously activated glycine and GABA(A) receptor channels had higher Cl- permeability than that of their extrasynaptic counterparts. The beta-amino acids activated long-duration bursts at extrasynaptic glycine receptors, consistent with a role in detection of ambient taurine or beta-alanine. Heterogeneous kinetics and permeabilities implicate molecular and functional diversity in thalamic glycine receptors. Fast, intermediate, and slow inhibitory postsynaptic potential decays, mostly attributed to cotransmission by glycinergic and GABAergic pathways, allow for discriminative modulation and integration with voltage-dependent currents in ventrobasal neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207