MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079732393 · doi:10.1159/000249623

Characterization of Cellular Infiltrates in Skin Lesions of Atopic Eczema by Means of Monoclonal Antibodies

2009· article· en· W2079732393 on OpenAlexaff
Carla Rocha, Josianne de Maubeuge, M Sarfati, Micheline Song, G. Delespesse

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermisMonoclonal antibodyEpidermis (zoology)PathologyInfiltration (HVAC)Peripheral blood mononuclear cellAtopic dermatitisImmunofluorescenceMedicineCellular infiltrationAntibodyImmunologyChemistryInflammationAnatomyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frozen skin biopsies from 3 acute and 3 chronic lesions of atopic dermatitis were examined by means of various ortho-monoclonal antibodies (OKT3, 4] not equal to----4, OKT6, OKT8; OKIa and OKM1) in an indirect immunofluorescence technique. The results show that both T helper (T4) and T suppressor cytotoxic (T8) lymphocytes are present in the inflammatory infiltration which predominantly contained Ia mononuclear cells. Despite the absence of double staining procedure, the observations suggest that T4 cells predominate over T8 cells in the acute lesions whereas the reverse tendency is noted in the chronic lesions. T8 cells are found mainly in the superficial dermis or even in the epidermis; by contrast, T4 cells tend to be more deeply located in the dermis. The lesions are characterized by a dramatic increase in the number of Langerhans cells (OKT6, OKIa+) that are found not only in the epidermis but also in the dermis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatologicaSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207