MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079751219 · doi:10.1021/ja004324z

First Direct Structural Comparison of Complexes of the Same Metal Fragment to Ketenes in Both C,C- and C,O-Bonding Modes

2001· article· en· W2079751219 on OpenAlex
Douglas B. Grotjahn, Laura S. B. Collins, Marcus Wolpert, G.A. Bikzhanova, H. Christine Lo, David J. Combs, John L. Hubbard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsKeteneChemistryLigand (biochemistry)StereochemistryInfrared spectroscopyCrystallographyBond lengthMetalTrans effectBond cleavageMedicinal chemistryCrystal structureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a series of Ir(I) and Rh(I) ketene complexes, conclusions about the structure and bonding of complexes of the fundamentally important ketene ligand class are reached. In a unique comparison of X-ray structures of the same metal fragment to ketenes in both the eta(2)-(C,C) and the eta(2)-(C,O) binding mode, the Ir-Cl bond distances in complexes of trans-Cl(Ir)[P(i-Pr)(3)](2) to phenylketene [4, eta(2)-(C,C)] and diphenylketene [2a, eta(2)-(C,O)] are 2.371(3) and 2.285(2) A, respectively. This would be consistent with greater trans influence of a ketene ligand bound to a metal through its C=C bond than one connected by its C=O bond. Back-bonding of Ir(I) and Rh(I) to diphenylketene was assessed using trans-Cl(M)[P(i-Pr)(3)](2)[eta(2)-(C,O)-diphenylketene] (2a and 2d). Most bond lengths and angles are identical, but slightly greater back-bonding by Ir(I) is suggested by the somewhat greater deformation of the ketene C=C=O system [C-C-O angles are 136.6(4) and 138.9(4) in the Ir and Rh cases 2a and 2d, respectively]. Syntheses of new labeled ketenes Ph(2)C=(13)C=O and Ph(2)C=C=(18)O and their Ir(I) and Rh(I) complexes are reported, along with the generation of an Ir(I) complex of PhCH=(13)C=O. The effects of isotopic substitution on infrared absorption data for ketene complexes are presented for the first time. Preliminary normal coordinate mode analysis allowed definitive assignment of absorptions ascribed to the C-O stretching frequencies of coordinated ketenes, which are near the absorptions for aromatic ring systems commonly found as substituents on ketenes. For free diphenylketene and four of its complexes and a phenylketene complex characterized by X-ray diffraction, the magnitude of the (13)C-(13)C coupling between the two ketene carbons is correlated to carbon-carbon bond distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it