First Direct Structural Comparison of Complexes of the Same Metal Fragment to Ketenes in Both C,C- and C,O-Bonding Modes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a series of Ir(I) and Rh(I) ketene complexes, conclusions about the structure and bonding of complexes of the fundamentally important ketene ligand class are reached. In a unique comparison of X-ray structures of the same metal fragment to ketenes in both the eta(2)-(C,C) and the eta(2)-(C,O) binding mode, the Ir-Cl bond distances in complexes of trans-Cl(Ir)[P(i-Pr)(3)](2) to phenylketene [4, eta(2)-(C,C)] and diphenylketene [2a, eta(2)-(C,O)] are 2.371(3) and 2.285(2) A, respectively. This would be consistent with greater trans influence of a ketene ligand bound to a metal through its C=C bond than one connected by its C=O bond. Back-bonding of Ir(I) and Rh(I) to diphenylketene was assessed using trans-Cl(M)[P(i-Pr)(3)](2)[eta(2)-(C,O)-diphenylketene] (2a and 2d). Most bond lengths and angles are identical, but slightly greater back-bonding by Ir(I) is suggested by the somewhat greater deformation of the ketene C=C=O system [C-C-O angles are 136.6(4) and 138.9(4) in the Ir and Rh cases 2a and 2d, respectively]. Syntheses of new labeled ketenes Ph(2)C=(13)C=O and Ph(2)C=C=(18)O and their Ir(I) and Rh(I) complexes are reported, along with the generation of an Ir(I) complex of PhCH=(13)C=O. The effects of isotopic substitution on infrared absorption data for ketene complexes are presented for the first time. Preliminary normal coordinate mode analysis allowed definitive assignment of absorptions ascribed to the C-O stretching frequencies of coordinated ketenes, which are near the absorptions for aromatic ring systems commonly found as substituents on ketenes. For free diphenylketene and four of its complexes and a phenylketene complex characterized by X-ray diffraction, the magnitude of the (13)C-(13)C coupling between the two ketene carbons is correlated to carbon-carbon bond distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".