MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079760491 · doi:10.2310/7750.2006.00025

Ultraviolet a Radiation and The Need for Protection

2006· article· en· W2079760491 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Bissonnette, Joël Claveau, Aditya K. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsInnovaderm (Canada)Centre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecHealth Sciences CentreMediprobe Research (Canada)University of TorontoHôtel-Dieu de QuébecSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyErythemaUltraviolet radiationSunscreening AgentsSun protectionSkin cancerMelanomaSun protection factorBroad spectrumCancerCancer researchInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erythema is a readily visible, often painful, natural phenomenon indicative of prolonged cutaneous exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation in the UVB range. As a result, early sunscreens were designed to provide adequate protection from UVB radiation. However, the continuous rise in the melanoma incidence rate alludes to the existence of an established photocarcinogen from which we are not well protected. Recently, scientists have been evaluating the photodamaging effects caused by wavelengths other than UVB. They have presented evidence that suggests that UVA exposure poses a greater hazard than previously acknowledged. For this reason, more emphasis must be placed on the development of broad-spectrum sunscreens providing adequate UVA and UVB protection. Additionally, regular sunscreen application must be advocated, proactive sun-protective practices must be implemented, and greater public awareness of the harmful effects of UVA and UVB radiation must be improved on, with the hope of decreasing the rate of cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207