MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079791675 · doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrt045

Religion and Medicine, Again: JHMAS Commentary on "The Lourdes Medical Cures Revisited"

2013· letter· en· W2079791675 on OpenAlex
Jacalyn Duffin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)History of medicineClassicsMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Religion and Medicine, Again: JHMAS Commentary on “The Lourdes Medical Cures Revisited” Get access Jacalyn Duffin Jacalyn Duffin Hannah Chair of the History of Medicine, Queen's University, 78 Barrie St., Kingston, CanadaK7L 3N6 Email: duffinj@queensu.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Volume 69, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 162–165, https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrt045 Published: 06 October 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.021
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it