Channel-aware distributed dynamic spectrum access via learning-based heterogeneous multi-channel auction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the design of a distributed online learning and access mechanism for dynamic spectrum access, where channel availability statistics are unknown to each secondary user (SU). Unlike existing distributed access policies, we explore the instantaneous channel gain of SUs' channels for multi-user multi-channel diversity gain. We consider an auction-based approach. For the primary channels with heterogeneous statistics, we apply the unit demand auction [1] to determine each SU's selection of a primary channel based on its instantaneous rate over each channel. We further propose a learning based unit demand (LBUD) auction, where each SU only bids for the M-best channels estimated by itself through distributed learning. The new mechanism not only reduces communication overhead, but also improves the throughput performance when the primary channels have dissimilar availability statistics. In addition, we show that the LBUD auction preserves the strong property of unit demand auction, i.e. it is dominant strategy incentive compatible. To improve the convergence speed of the iterative procedure of channel allocation in the auction, we also propose an adaptive price increment algorithm. Simulations show the effectiveness of our proposed auction mechanism in throughput gain by exploring instantaneous channel fade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Simulation or modeling | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Methods About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Simulation or modeling | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it