MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079808865 · doi:10.1139/o06-043

Binding of oxovanadium ions to the major and minor grooves of DNA duplex: stability and structural models

2006· article· en· W2079808865 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Amin Ahmed Ouameur, Hisayuki Arakawa, H.A. Tajmir‐Riahi

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVanadium and Halogenation Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuanineDNAChemistryThymineBinding constantVanadateAqueous solutionCytosineCrystallographyStereochemistryBinding siteNucleotideInorganic chemistryBiochemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vanadate induces DNA strand breaks in cultured human fibroblasts at doses that are relative to the occupational exposure. Oxovanadium compounds also exert preventive effects against chemical carcinogenesis in animals and form complexes with DNA in vivo. This study was designed to examine the interaction of calf-thymus DNA with VO2+ and VO3 ions in aqueous solution at physiological pH, with a constant DNA concentration of 12.5 mmol/L and vanadium-DNA (phosphate) molar ratios (r) of 1:160 to 1:2. Capillary electrophoresis and Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy were used to determine the cation binding site, the binding constant, the helix stability, and DNA conformation in the oxovanadium-DNA complexes. Structural analysis showed that VO2+ binds DNA through guanine and adenine N-7 atoms and the backbone PO2 group with apparent binding constants of KG = 8.8 x 10(5) (mol/L)-1 and KA = 3.4 x 10(5) (mol/L)-1. The VO3 shows weaker binding through thymine, adenine, and guanine bases, with K = 1.9 x 10(4) (mol/L)-1 and no interaction with the backbone phosphate group. A partial B-to-A DNA transition occurred upon VO-DNA complexation, while DNA remains in the B-family structure in the VO3 complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicVanadium and Halogenation ChemistryFrench-language works237,207