MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079827702 · doi:10.1021/jf0011541

Different Tocopherols and the Relationship between Two Methods for Determination of Primary Oxidation Products in Fish Oil

2001· article· en· W2079827702 on OpenAlexaff
Elin Kulås, R. G. Ackman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen peroxideAntioxidantConjugated dienePeroxide valueConjugated systemPeroxideTocopherolFish <Actinopterygii>RadicalLipid oxidationFood scienceOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryVitamin EBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of 2.32 mmol/kg (approximately 1000 ppm) of alpha-, gamma-, or delta-tocopherol (TOH), as well as different levels of alpha TOH, on the formation of hydroperoxides in fish oil was studied by monitoring the peroxide value (POV) and the formation of conjugated dienes (CD) during storage at 30 degrees C. The same order of antioxidant activity was observed by both methods. Linear regression of POV on CD showed that these data were strongly correlated (r(2) > or = 0.98). The value of the slope of the regression lines, however, differed substantially and decreased with increasing hydrogen-donating ability of the different tocopherols and with increasing alpha TOH concentration. It is suggested that this is due, at least in part, to the contribution from hydroxy compounds to the CD measurements and a greater contribution from hydroperoxy epidioxides (two peroxide groups per conjugated diene unit) to the POV than to the CD value. The degrees of formation of both these groups of oxidation products are expected to be influenced by the rate of scavenging of lipid peroxyl and alkoxyl radicals by tocopherol (alpha TOH > gamma TOH > delta TOH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207